<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com/wp-content/themes/aob-mar-2017/rss/feed-rss2.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com/wp-content/themes/aob-mar-2017/rss/feed-rss2.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Asheville On Bikescascading Archives - Asheville On Bikes</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com/tag/cascading/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Cultivating bicycle culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 22:05:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
  <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
  <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
  <dct:isPartOf>https://ashevilleonbikes.com/wp-content/themes/aob-mar-2017</dct:isPartOf>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Letter in opposition to the cascading of Section A of the I-26 Connector Project</title>
		<link>https://ashevilleonbikes.com/letter-in-opposition-to-the-cascading-of-section-a-of-the-i-26-connector-project</link>
		<comments>https://ashevilleonbikes.com/letter-in-opposition-to-the-cascading-of-section-a-of-the-i-26-connector-project#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 19:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:date>Jun 19, 2018</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Asheville on Bikes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6 lane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amboy road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cascading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complete street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[french broad river mpo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-26 connector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section A]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ashevilleonbikes.com/?p=6546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>June 18, 2018 French Broad River MPO 339 New Leicester Highway Asheville, NC  28804 Dear MPO leaders: On behalf of our members and supporters, Asheville on Bikes and MountainTrue write in opposition to cascading Section A of the I-26 Connector Project from the statewide to the regional tier of projects. We firmly believe that negotiations<br /><a class="read-more" href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com/letter-in-opposition-to-the-cascading-of-section-a-of-the-i-26-connector-project">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com/letter-in-opposition-to-the-cascading-of-section-a-of-the-i-26-connector-project">Letter in opposition to the cascading of Section A of the I-26 Connector Project</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com">Asheville On Bikes</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>June 18, 2018</p>
<p>French Broad River MPO</p>
<p>339 New Leicester Highway</p>
<p>Asheville, NC  28804</p>
<p>Dear MPO leaders:</p>
<p>On behalf of our members and supporters, <a href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com">Asheville on Bikes</a> and <a href="https://mountaintrue.org">MountainTrue</a> write in opposition to cascading Section A of the I-26 Connector Project from the statewide to the regional tier of projects. We firmly believe that negotiations between the City of Asheville and NCDOT on outstanding design questions related to the Connector Project should be completed and incorporated into the final Environmental Impact Statement before the project moves forward. We cannot support cascading Section A until this occurs.</p>
<p>We recognize that the City’s negotiations with NCDOT to date have produced several good outcomes including new bike/pedestrian facilities, good greenway connections, a Section A with six lanes instead of eight, and a much-improved redesign of the Amboy Road interchange (though no one has yet seen revised maps that reflect these design improvements). However, there has not yet been success in determining the number of lanes going across the river and in the design of the Patton Avenue/Bowen Bridge corridor. The City of Asheville remains committed to making this corridor a multi-modal, urban boulevard that serves as a gateway to downtown, but NCDOT is not yet committed to these outcomes.</p>
<p>Until negotiations with NCDOT are complete and the drawings are updated so that the City can say with confidence that the project will increase livability for the residents of Asheville, advance active transportation, and meet the City’s vision for the redevelopment of Patton Ave, we stand with the City of Asheville in opposing cascading Section A. We strongly encourage NCDOT to continue to work with the City of Asheville to reach agreement on these critical design issues.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Mike Sule, Executive Director<br />
Asheville on Bikes</p>
<p>Bob Wagner, Co-Director<br />
Mountain True</p>
<p>To support Asheville on Bikes and Mountain True, please send emails supporting our position to these members of the MPO:</p>
<p>mpo@landofsky.org<br />
cc: brownie.newman@buncombecounty.org<br />
cc: jasmine.beach-ferrara@buncombecounty.org<br />
cc: info@ashevilleonbikes.com</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com/letter-in-opposition-to-the-cascading-of-section-a-of-the-i-26-connector-project">Letter in opposition to the cascading of Section A of the I-26 Connector Project</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com">Asheville On Bikes</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://ashevilleonbikes.com/letter-in-opposition-to-the-cascading-of-section-a-of-the-i-26-connector-project/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Action Alert: We Support a No Vote at the MPO for Cascading the I-26 Section A Project</title>
		<link>https://ashevilleonbikes.com/action-alert-we-support-a-no-vote-at-the-mpo-for-cascading-the-i-26-section-a-project</link>
		<comments>https://ashevilleonbikes.com/action-alert-we-support-a-no-vote-at-the-mpo-for-cascading-the-i-26-section-a-project#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 01:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:date>May 23, 2018</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Asheville on Bikes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cascading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fbrmpo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[french broad river metropolitan planning organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-26 connector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-26 section A]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ashevilleonbikes.com/?p=6378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What you can do: Please contact Mayor Esther Manheimer and city council members and let them know you support the City’s decision to oppose cascading funds for section A of the I-26 widening project. What is happening? The French Broad MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization) will vote on Thursday, May 24th about the option to cascade<br /><a class="read-more" href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com/action-alert-we-support-a-no-vote-at-the-mpo-for-cascading-the-i-26-section-a-project">Read More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com/action-alert-we-support-a-no-vote-at-the-mpo-for-cascading-the-i-26-section-a-project">Action Alert: We Support a No Vote at the MPO for Cascading the I-26 Section A Project</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com">Asheville On Bikes</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What you can do:</strong> Please contact Mayor Esther Manheimer and city council members and let them know you support the City’s decision to oppose cascading funds for section A of the I-26 widening project.</p>
<p><strong>What is happening?</strong><br />
The French Broad MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization) will vote on Thursday, May 24th about the option to cascade funding from the Statewide Mobility into the Regional Tier for Section A of the I-26 project. Section A is the portion of I-26 and I-240 redesign west of the French Broad River. Here are the Section A maps in two links to pdfs. <a href="https://xfer.services.ncdot.gov/PDEA/Web/I26/I-2513_PHM_AERIAL_SECA_sht1.pdf">Link to I-26 Section A Map 1</a> and <a href="https://xfer.services.ncdot.gov/PDEA/Web/I26/I-2513_PHM_AERIAL_SECA_sht2.pdf">Link to I-26 Section A Map 2</a> </p>
<p><strong>What is cascading?</strong> Cascading is a funding mechanism that enables a transportation project to move forward by shifting the funding source from a statewide pot of money to another more local, or regional, pot of money. A vote must be held by the regional planning authority, here the French Broad River Metropolitan Planning Organization (FBRMPO), for a state level project to be cascaded down, in part because that project will then compete with other planned work set forth by the MPO.</p>
<p><strong>What is the backstory?</strong><br />
Asheville City Council is currently opposed to cascading funding for section A because designs for the remaining sections are still being negotiated between NCDOT and City of Asheville. The City of Asheville continues to support robust bike / ped facilities and a reduction in travel lanes along Patton Ave while the NCDOT remains uncommitted to these outcomes. A critical immediate step in advancing active transportation is for the city to vote no on the cascading option.  </p>
<p><strong>Why else is the City opposed to cascading this project?</strong> If the FBRMPO were to cascade the funding for this project, it means the project will compete for funding priority at the regional level. Given the costs associated with Section A of the I-26 connector, it is likely to have negative consequence for many other good but smaller projects already planned in the Western North Carolina region.</p>
<p>Lastly, the entire I-26 connector project is a $600-$800 million project that is justified because it has statewide benefits; it is split into sections arbitrarily as part of the normal planning process for a large project. Are we now to burden local regional governments because one of the arbitrary sections in the overall project scored poorly in a state traffic formula*, when, if it were  sectioned differently, the project would have easily scored highly as an appropriate use of state funds? </p>
<p>Please contact Mayor Esther Manheimer and city council members and let them know you support the City’s decision to oppose cascading funds for section A of the I-26 widening project.</p>
<p>Need a refresher about the I-26 project? <a href="https://vimeo.com/ursci/review/145667973/d06fb7bdc8">Watch the NCDOT visualization that covers the entire project area in all its sections. Only section A is potentially affected by this vote</a>. </p>
<p>People who you should email in support of the City&#8217;s position, which is to oppose the cascading of Section A of the I-26 project: </p>
<ul>
<li>Esther Manheimer, esthermanheimer@avlcouncil.com</li>
<li>Gwen Wisler, gwenwisler@avlcouncil.com</li>
<li>Julie Mayfield, juliemayfield@avlcouncil.com</li>
<li>Brian Haynes, brianhaynes@avlcouncil.com</li>
<li>Keith Young, keithyoung@avlcouncil.com</li>
<li>Vijay Kapoor, vijaykapoor@avlcouncil.com</li>
<li>Sheneika Smith, sheneikasmith@avlcouncil.com</li>
</ul>
<p>When you send an email, please cc: info@ashevilleonbikes.com </p>
<p>*In order to qualify for 100% state level funding, a project must provide a strong statewide benefit using a specific state formula that measures, among other things, congestion. By splitting the project into arbitrary sections and then applying the formula to each section, we are  being told that Section A, by itself, is not congested enough right now to be a good use of state funds and thus (if cascaded) it should jockey for priority within the region. Among the problems with that logic: NCDOT has, for over a decade, defended the need for an 8 lane interstate along this section because of congestion and capacity needs. Which is it? </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com/action-alert-we-support-a-no-vote-at-the-mpo-for-cascading-the-i-26-section-a-project">Action Alert: We Support a No Vote at the MPO for Cascading the I-26 Section A Project</a> appeared first on <a href="https://ashevilleonbikes.com">Asheville On Bikes</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://ashevilleonbikes.com/action-alert-we-support-a-no-vote-at-the-mpo-for-cascading-the-i-26-section-a-project/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>


